1. L- directed
thinking is an attitude to life that is characteristic of the left hemisphere
of the brain—sequential, literal, textual etc…
R- directed thinking is an attitude to life that is
characteristic to the right hemisphere of the brain—simultaneous, metaphorical,
aesthetic, contextual etc…
My subject (History) requires both these ways of
thinking to fully grasp the meaning and lesson of the subject. If forced to
choose I would say R-directed thinking is more valuable, but L-directed
thinking is needed to put events in sequential order to fully comprehend the
spatial significance an event might have.
I can try and reach this balance by constantly
intertwining R and L directed thinking in the lessons. Do not expect students
to remember every single date of an event, but on which ones came after which
and why. When this is learned, filling in dates will be easier to remember by
the events already being grounded in their knowledge base.
2. AAA
(Abundance, Asia, Automation) greatly diminishes L-directed thinking in
business and schools. True, in the United States’ past it was important to be
able to produce a mass of goods at a quick pace. These two factors almost
always guaranteed success. Presently, things are not as simple. With the flood
of products and the competition of cheap labor across U.S. borders, new aspects
are necessary to become successful in business. Abundance has caused a greater
attention to the aesthetics of products. As machines once replaced the
workforce in the early 20th century, such is the case with computers
and human knowledge, turning it into a kind of automated knowledge. In short,
AAA is no longer just effecting the blue collar workforce, but the white collar
as well. White collar workers are now faced with the decision to become masters
in their field (with the help of R-directed thinking) or become outsourced.
Schools find themselves thrown in the predicament because they are supposed to
cultivate the next generation of workers and contributors. If the work force is
changing, so must the curricula taught in schools.
3. High
Concept- Capacity to detect patterns and opportunities to create
artistic and emotional beauty, to craft a satisfying narrative, and to combine
seemingly unrelated ideas into something new.
High Touch- The
ability to empathize with others, to understand the subtleties of human
interaction, to find joy in one’s self and to elicit it in other, and to
stretch beyond the seemingly mundane in pursuit of purpose and meaning.
Both these are extremely important in my teaching. It
is a combination of being able to make sense of a subject to students in an
interesting and genuine way. It is possible to teach with only having one or
the other, but the combination of these two principles will not only make the
learning experience memorable, but also enjoyable.
4. The flaws
in an education system that only values IQ are the same flaws in a business
that only values L-directed thinking, they both create uncreative students or
workers. The role of EQ in education is to teach students to be productive,
motivated and valuable members of whichever community they are a part of (home,
school, athletics).
Gabe,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate your insight into how you are continuously thinking about weaving L-directed and R-directed thinking into your subject of history. I completely agree that when students are able to understand the sequence of events, and especially why the sequence occurred the way it did, the actual dates become less important and/or will be able to be logically determined.
Like Kitri, I think it is great that you are able to see how the analysis and creativity can be used in the history classroom. I know traditionally, as in most classrooms, history has been taught in a way that profits only those kids that can think analytically. I expect your future students will flourish because you are willing to tap into their creative sides.
ReplyDelete